You Broke It
What you've done since you won
Proposed - April 2026
Cut up to 160,000 participants by 2030
At the National Press Club on 22 April 2026, Mark Butler announced plans to reduce the NDIS from approximately 760,000 participants to 600,000 by 2030. That's one in five current participants you plan to remove.
Source: Butler NPC speech, 22 April 2026
His words - April 2026
"An ATM for shonks, grifters, fraudsters and crooks"
That's what your Minister called the scheme you built. Not the consultants billing $25M without a tender. Not the $5M/month CRM. Not the agency that reviews 0.4% of claims. The scheme. The one with 59,848 children in it. The one whose staff got it wrong 7 out of 10 times underfunding participants - so you spent $34.8M of taxpayer money fighting them at tribunal instead of fixing the decisions.
Source: Insurance Business Magazine, April 2026
Proposed - April 2026
Reduce average plans from $31k to $26k
A $5,000 cut to the average plan. For a child on a $17,000 plan, that's the difference between two therapies and one. Between learning to talk and learning to sit up. You're asking parents to choose.
Source: Butler NPC speech, 22 April 2026
Announced - December 2025
Changed the law so the ART can't overrule plan funding
You lost 73% of cases at the tribunal. So you changed the law. The ART can't change your plan funding anymore. It can only send you back to the NDIA for another assessment - using the same tool that got it wrong the first time. The needs assessment itself (s 32L) isn't even a reviewable decision under s 99. You can't challenge the thing that decides your funding.
The NDIA confirmed at Senate Estimates this saves them money. Of course it does. It's cheaper when people can't fight back.
Source: NDIS Amendment Act 2024 (s 32L, s 99) · Senate Estimates, December 2025 · NDIS Quarterly Report Q3 2024-25
Collapsed - March 2026
AEIOU Foundation: 120 children lost therapy overnight
Australia's largest specialist autism early intervention provider collapsed in March 2026 after average funding packages were cut by 70%. Centres closed immediately. 120 children lost services overnight. These weren't "shonks." They were speech therapists working with three-year-olds who can't speak yet.
Source: ABC News, 22 April 2026
Legislated - October 2024
Allied health evidence: from mandatory to optional
Under the old Act (s 33), planners had to "have regard to relevant assessments." Your OT's report, your speech therapist's recommendations - mandatory consideration.
Under the new framework (s 32L), the assessor - not an allied health professional - only has to consider reports the NDIA specifically requests. Everything else your therapist writes? The law says "may have regard to." Not must. May.
The person who sees your child every week writes a report. The person who's never met them can legally ignore it. Then a computer calculates the budget.
Sources: NDIS Act s 33 (old) vs s 32L (new) · NDIS Summary of Legislation Changes · Every Australian Counts · SWAN Autism
Every one of these is your doing. Not the Liberals. Not Pauline Hanson. You. The party that built the NDIS is now proposing the largest contraction in its history. You don't get to blame the opposition for what you're choosing to do.
The Numbers You're Hiding
You know these figures. You choose not to say them.
What you say vs. what's true
You say 40% of participants have autism. You don't mention autism accounts for only 21.4% of spending.
You cite 40% because it sounds alarming. You don't cite 21.4% because it undermines your narrative. Headcount isn't cost. You know this. You're counting on voters not knowing it.
Source: NDIS Payments Data & Participant Numbers, Dec 2025 · 324,206 autism participants of 761,442 total · $10.49B of $48.96B total spending
What you say vs. what's true
You say the scheme is unsustainable. You don't mention Australia spends 1.7% of GDP on disability - below the OECD average of 2.2%. Denmark spends 4.7%.
"Unsustainable" is a political word, not a fiscal fact. By every international comparison, Australia's disability spending is below average. You're not overspending. You're underspending and calling it reform.
Source: OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX) · Federal Budget 2025-26 · Grattan Institute, "Saving the NDIS" (2024)
What you spent vs. what you won
You spent $34.8M in one year fighting participants at the AAT. You lost 73% of the time. Your solution: change the law.
$34.8 million of taxpayer money. $17.3 million to external law firms. Seven times out of ten, a tribunal told you your own decisions were wrong. Instead of making better decisions, you changed the law so the ART can't overrule you anymore. That's not reform. That's cover.
Source: FOI disclosure, Dec 2021 (Right to Know) · NDIS Quarterly Report Q3 2024-25 · Senate Estimates Dec 2025